22 Hilti SIW 10-22 3/4″ High-Torque Cordless Impact Wrench

Hilti NURON SIW 10-22 Impact Wrench

5/5

Manufacturer: Hilti
Model number: SIW 10-22
Price: $420
Power source: Li-Ion
Motor size: Brushless
Weight: 6.4 lbs (Bare Tool)

Specifications and Features

• Anvil Type: 3/4″ through hole with friction ring
• Maximum Torque: 627 ft-lbs (1); 1180 ft-lbs (2)
• Nut Busting Torque: 1475 ft-lbs
• Full Hammering Frequency: 2500 impacts/minute
• Number of Gears: 2
• No Load RPM: Gear 1: 1000 rpm, Gear 2: 1250 rpm
• Dimensions: 8.5″ x 3.4″ x 9.3″
• Tool Weight: 6.4 lbs (Bare Tool)
• A-Weighted Emission Sound Pressure Level: 97 dB
• Brushless Motor

High-Torque Performance

The Hilti SIW 10-22 3/4″ High-Torque Impact Wrench isn’t adorned with fancy controls or features. However, it’s a straight forward powerhouse for really difficult fastening applications. The combination of the robust brushless motor and the new NURON battery platform result in one of the most powerful cordless 3/4″ impact wrenches.

Sending tools to the fleet mechanic in the quarry usually results in a short life. The environment and shear size of the equipment makes it the perfect testing location for high capacity tools like the Hilti SIW 10-22 Impact Wrench. One of the most impressive things about the SIW 10-22 is the nut busting capability of this wrench. It can break free many bolted connections that some 1″ cordless impact wrenches can’t do.

It’s so powerful that it will break fasteners. Hilti publishes a warning on their site stating that there is a risk of over-tightening and damaging fasteners. This impact wrench broke off several 5/8″ fasteners with very little effort, therefore users should be careful on small fastener applications.

The SIW 10-22 doesn’t have many features which is refreshing with an impact wrench. The SIW 10-22 has a well placed LED light just above the battery that provides good light for the work surface. There is a simple switch to change between speed 1 and 2. It also has a simple green LED light to designate which gear its in.

For those that work at height and require a positive retention for sockets the SIW 10-22 has a  through hole friction ring anvil. It’s a pretty simple system and works well.

Final Thoughts – Hilti SIW 10-22

The Hilti SIW 10-22 High-Torque 3/4″ Impact Wrench is outstanding. It’s built like a tank, it has very impressive torque, has a great price point, and it offers one of the best warranties on the market. This is an exceptional cordless impact wrench for steel erectors, fleet mechanics and anyone working with large diameter fasteners.

Hilti SIW 10-22 3/4″ High-Torque Impact Wrench Review is a post from Tool Box Buzz

Hilti NURON Cordless 1/2″ High Torque Drill Driver – SF 10W-22

Hilti NURON SF 10W-22 Cordless Drill Driver

5/5

Manufacturer: Hilti
Model number: SF 10W-22
Price: $289
Power source: Li-Ion
Motor size: Brushless
Weight: 4.1 lbs (Tool Only)

Specifications & Features

• Maximum Torque: 841 in-lb (soft joint), 1062 in-lb (hard joint)
• No Load RPM: gear 1: 330 rpm; gear 2: 560 rpm; gear 3: 1300 rpm; gear 4: 2230 rpm
• Clutch Settings: 15
• Dimensions: 9.4 x 2.6 x 8.7 inches
• Tool Only Weight: 4.1 lbs
• Brushless Motor
• Full Metal Chuck
• Optimized Cooling
• Active Torque Control (ATC) helps prevent uncontrolled spinning if the drill bit sticks
• LED Work Light

Picture above is the speed selection switches that give this drill a huge range of control. The chuck also has a traditional clutch setting from 1-15 and a drill setting.

Hilti continues to build quality tools with less of the “bells and whistles” that some manufactures crank out. The SF 10W-22 has an all steel chuck with really good knurling on the chuck surface. The keyless design is simple and straightforward and locks bits into place really well.

The SF 10W-22 comes with a LED light mounted just above the battery which provides decent light for the work area. It also comes with a removable, multi-position side handle which is very useful considering the torque this drill produces.

Performance That Packs a Punch

There are lots of tools out there that continue to get smaller and lighter. The Hilti NURON SF 10W-22 isn’t small and it isn’t light. This is a large, powerful 1/2″ drill that not only delivers great torque for difficult drilling applications, but it also has a 15 step clutch, and 4 speed settings that allows users to also deal with delicate drilling applications. This much improved 1/2″ drill boasts a powerful brushless motor that cranks out the torque when paired with Hilti’s NURON line of batteries.

The torque that the Hilti SF 10W-22 produces is impressive to say the least. It mixes drywall compound easier than this drywall crews electric 1/2″ drill. The crew was impressed with the power and speed. The SF 10W-22 is impressive drilling wood as well. Designed for bits up to 6″ this drill can tackle any drilling applications that require the power of larger drills.

Final Thoughts – Hilti NURON SF 10W-22

Hilti’s updated NURON line-up has been impressive. The NURON SF 10W-22 1/2″ Drill Driver isn’t full of fancy extras, it’s a robust, quality built 1/2″ drill driver built for demanding drilling applications. Hilti continues to impress with really well built tools that are designed to take punishment on busy jobsites and keep working day after day. If you are looking for an extremely powerful 1/2″ drill this is one to consider. Priced at $289 for the bare tool, it’s a good value for the quality of this drill.

Hilti NURON SF 10W-22 Cordless Drill Driver Review is a post from Tool Box Buzz

Hilti PT-C Thermal Imaging Camera

Hilti PT-C THERMAL CAMERA

4.5/5

Manufacturer: Hilti
Model number: PT-C
Power source: 12 Volt

The applications of thermal imaging are vast and diverse. In the industrial sector, thermal imaging cameras are used to reveal hidden insights, and provide preventive maintenance. By detecting overheating in machinery or electrical circuits, these cameras can help prevent costly equipment failures and enhance safety.

Features

• High resolution
• Wide temperature range – thermal imaging from -20 °C up to 600 °C
• Drop resistant up to 1.5m
• IP rating IP54
• Transfer data via USB-C including voice notes, infrared picture, and optical picture to help you quickly document your work.

Specifications

• Temperature – range -4 °F – 1112 °F
• Measuring accuracy
from -20 °C to -10 °C (-4 °F to 14 °F): +/- 4° C, from -10 °C to 100 °C (14 °F to 212 °F): +/- 2° C, from 100 °C to 600 °C (212 °F to 1112 °F):  +/- 2 %
• Temperature resolution 0.1 °C
• Operating temperature range 14 – 122 °F
• Resolution, infrared sensor 256 x 192 pixels
• Field of view (FOV) 40° x 30°
• Battery lifetime 10 h
• Max. internal image memory 600
• IP protection class IP 54 (IEC 529)

Lack of insulation at intersection of partition wall and exterior wall

View where insulation deficiency is

Uses For the Hilti PT-C Thermal Camera

Detecting Heat Loss and Insulation Issues

Thermal imaging pinpoints areas of heat loss, poor insulation, and water leaks swiftly and accurately. This capability is invaluable for energy audits, building inspections, and ensuring structural integrity. It’s also useful in locating previously installed heat / AC piping and radiant heat lines or checking for leakage.

Circuit breakers

Dishwasher circuit – unit running

Electrical Wiring Maintenance

Identifying overheating in electrical systems is critical for preventing equipment failures and ensuring workplace safety. Thermal cameras help detect hot spots in electrical panels and wiring, enabling proactive maintenance.

Checking 3-Phase Equipment

By visualizing temperature imbalances in three-phase electrical equipment, thermal imaging facilitates early detection of potential malfunctions, enhancing equipment reliability and longevity.

Furnace manifold

Furnace zones running

Mechanical Installations

Thermal imaging aids in the preventive maintenance of mechanical systems by detecting heat generated by friction and stress. This proactive approach minimizes downtime and extends the lifespan of machinery.

Gas Detection

Infrared imaging serves as a valuable tool for detecting gas leaks in construction sites, enhancing safety protocols, and preventing potential hazards.

Basement window, heat loss

Basement window, brick foundation

Identifying Structural Defects

Thermal imaging helps detect defects in concrete structures, bridge decks, and paved surfaces, allowing for timely repairs and maintenance.

Pest Detection

Thermal cameras assist in locating pests within walls and structures, by locating nesting hot spot. This facilitates targeted pest control measures without the need for invasive inspections.

Controls

Operating the PT-C thermal Camera

We found that Hilti kept the PT-C controls intuitive. The manual provided was not helpful, but Hilti does have a video online that we watched to learn how to use the camera.

The Hilti PT-C Thermal Imaging Camera Controls include:

• Trigger – captures photo.
• Four navigation (arrow) buttons
• A centered menu buttons.
• A camera icon used to “save image.”
• Power button – lower right
• Gallery button – upper left.
• Image lock/saves photocopies in different view settings. Upper right.
• Date Port – included USB-A computer to a USB-C camera port.

Evaluating The Hilti PT-C Thermal Camera

When reviewing the Hilti PT-C thermal camera in the field, we considered several factors that we felt determine the camera’s suitability for specific applications and ensure optimal performance for diverse construction scenarios.

1. Resolution

• The Hilti infrared sensor provides 256 x 192 pixels and can hold up to 600 internal infrared or overlay images.
• The higher resolution the clearer, more detailed thermal image. A thermal imaging camera with a high resolution can detect small temperature differences, making it ideal for tasks that require a high level of accuracy.

2. Sensitivity

• The Hilti PT-C has a sensitivity of a t wide temperature range -20 °C up to 600 °C. covering a broad spectrum of construction applications.

3. Field of View (FOV)

• The Hilti PT-C has a 40° x 30° FOV. A wider FOV is beneficial for scanning large areas quickly, while a narrow FOV is better suited for focusing on small, specific areas.

4. Functionality

• There are several features that he Hilti PT-C has that make it useful to construction professionals such as; seamless data transfer via USB-C, including voice notes, infrared images, and optical pictures for comprehensive documentation.

5. Run-time and durability

• The Hilti PT-C has a run-time of 10-hours, a drop rating of 1.5 meters, and an IP rating of IP 54 (IEC 529).
• An IP54-rating carries a level of water and dust resistance, it still leaves the device susceptible to damage if faced with jets of water, or temporary or continuous immersion in water.

Locating heat loss and air leaks that contribute to ice dams

Using the PT-C Thermal Imaging Camera

We used the Hilti PT-C thermal camera to locate electric radiant heat coils under a tile floor. The coils showed clear and when used with an overlay photo we could easily identify locations in the room later.

We also used it on the interior and exterior of a residential house to determine heat loss at the houses rim joist and around doors and windows. Inside we checked external walls for indications of rodent and carpenter ant nests.

The camera easily located the hot vs cold spots allowing us to make insulation and energy efficiency decisions. Lastly, we had our electrician use the camera to check for hot spots in several electrical panels we had on a recent job site.

Thoughts on the Hilti PT-C Thermal Camera

In conclusion, we feel that the Hilti PT-C Thermal Camera empowers construction professionals with cutting-edge thermal imaging technology, enhancing precision, efficiency, and safety across construction projects. The camera sells for $2,059.00

Hilti’s PT-C thermal camera allows professionals the ability to perform inspections, and make an informed decisions on hidden conditions and then use that information to diagnose or plan for repairs and maintenance.

Hilti PT-C Thermal Camera Review is a post from Tool Box Buzz

Top Cordless 1″ SDS Plus Rotary Hammer | Head-To-Head

In our head-to-head comparison, we focused on 1″ SDS-Plus rotary hammers with drop motors, catering to the largest group of SDS-Plus users. These drills are widely utilized by mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and building trades for tasks such as installing 3″ drop anchors, wedge anchors, screw anchors and chipping concrete.

Why Drop Motors?

The 1-inch SDS-Plus drop motor hammers are among the most popular drills on the market due to their compact size and versatility. They offer versatility and efficiency for various applications, making them a preferred choice for many users across different industries. Despite the rise in popularity of drop motor designs, some users still prefer the traditional D-handle style for specific applications such working in concrete forms or for ceiling and floor work.

SDS stands for Slotted Drive System or Slotted Drive Shaft, it was invented by Bosch in 1975. SDS and SDS-Plus are interchangeable, SDS-Plus is a newer standard featuring 4 splines for a more secure chuck fitment.

Our Objective

For us at Tool Box Buzz, our goal is to empower you to make informed decisions when selecting the best SDS-Plus Rotary Hammer Drill.

By providing comprehensive reviews and insights into the performance, features, and usability of each rotary hammer, we hope to assist you in finding the perfect tool for your projects. Whether you prioritize compactness, power, versatility, or ergonomics, we’re here to help you make the right choice.

Cordless SDS-Plus Rotary Hammer Lineup

Eleven manufacturers have submitted 15 contenders for the 1-inch SDS-Plus category, all designed for use on their 18-volt to 60-volt cordless platforms. Not every manufacturer labels their SDS-Plus drills as precisely 1 inch, so the range of testing spans from ⅞ inch to 1-⅛ inch.

BOSCH 18v Bulldog

Model – GBH18v-24C
Voltage – 18v
Size – 1”
RPMs – 980
BPMs – 0-4,350
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.80
Weight – 8.7 Lbs
Price – $270.00

DEWALT XR

Model – DCH273
Voltage – 20V
Size – 1”
RPMs – 1,100
BPMs – 0-4,600
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.55
Weight – 7.1 Lbs
Price – $329.00

DEWALT Flexvolt

Model – DCH416
Voltage – 60V
Size – 1-¼”
RPMs – 540
BPMs – 0-4,200
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 4.5
Weight – 12.25 Lbs
Price – $499.00

FLEX

Model – FX15511A-Z
Voltage – 24V
Size – 1”
RPMs – 980
BPMs – 0-4,350
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.9
Weight – 9.45 Lbs
Price – $299.00

HILTI Nuron

Model – TE 6-22 DRS
Voltage – 22V
Size – 1”
RPMs – 1050
BPMs – 0-5100
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.9
Weight – 8.1 Lbs
Price – $434.00

KOBALT

Model – KRH 124B-03
Voltage – 24V
Size – ⅞”
RPMs – 1,400
BPMs – 0-4,500
Weight – 6.15 Lbs
Price – $99.00

MAKITA 18v LXT

Model – XRH01Z

Voltage – 18VSize – 1”
RPMs – 950
BPMs – 0-4,700
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.7
Weight – 7.55 Lbs
Price – $379.00

MAKITA 36v LXT

Model – XRH05Z
Voltage – 36V (18v X 2)
Size – 1”
RPMs – 1,250
BPMs – 0-5,000
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 2.2
Weight – 10.3 Lbs
Price – $519.00

MAKITA 40v XGT

Model – GRH01Z
Voltage – 40V
Size – 1-1/8”
RPMs – 980
BPMs – 0-5000
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 2.8
Weight – 9.44 Lbs
Price – $589.00

Metabo

Model – KH18LTXBL28Q

Voltage – 18v
Size – 1-⅛”
RPMs – 1,000
BPMs – 0-4,470
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 3.0
Weight – 9.8 Lbs
Price – $361

METABO HPT 18v

Model – DH1826DALQ4
Voltage – 18V
Size – 1”
RPMs – 1,050
BPMs – 0-3,950
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.9
Weight – 8.05 Lbs
Price – $209.00

METABO HPT 36v

Model – DH3628DAQ4
Voltage – 36V
Size – 1-⅛”
RPMs – 950
BPMs – 0-4,300
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 2.3
Weight – 9.4 Lbs
Price – $279.00

MILWAUKEE M18 FUEL

Model – 2912-20
Voltage – 18V
Size – 1”
RPMs – 1,330
BPMs – 0-4,800
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 2.0
Weight – 9.25 Lbs
Price – $349.00

RIDGID

Model – R86712B
Voltage – 18V
Size – 1”
RPMs – 1,400
BPMs – 0-5,000
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.5
Weight – 8.05 Lbs
Price – $269.00

RYOBI

Model – P223
Voltage – 18V
Size – 1”
RPMs – 1,380
BPMs – 0-5,000
Blow Energy [Ft-Lbs] – 1.5
Weight – 7.45 Lbs
Price – $189.00

Head-To-Head Testing Criteria

Our team meticulously evaluated these cordless SDS-Plus rotary hammers, across five categories and ranked them.

1. Performance Test – Speed at drilling various size holes in concrete.
2. Efficiency Test – Run-time test of recommended battery normalized for Watt-Hour capacity.
3. Size and Weight – Size matters and weight can get cumbersome. We measured the dimensions and weight of each concrete drill as tested with batteries. [not factored in overall ranking]
4. On-Board Dust Collection – we tested and ranked features.
5. User Experience- Combination of features, ergonomics and subjective user evaluations.
   Additionally we included price, and best value charts for your consideration.

Silica Dust

The Tool Box Buzz Team recognizes the significant dangers that exposure to silica dust can pose to workers. While we always strive to use any and all personal protective equipment, there are times when we may omit certain PPE during testing. We want to remind anyone that uses concrete cutting and drilling tools to use proper protective equipment to prevent silica dust exposure.

Performance Evaluation | Drilling Test

This test evaluated the speed in which the tools could drill 3-inch deep holes into concrete with 4 different bit sizes. The drilling substrate used was 3,500 psi concrete blocks, 12” x 24” x 4.5″ deep. These concrete blocks had cured for 6-months.

Performance Test Procedure

Drill Sizes Evaluated: ¼”, ⅜”, ½”, and 1″ SDS-Plus rotary drill bits.

1. Five holes drilled to a depth of 3” using a depth rod and blue tape for accuracy.
2. Each hole was timed, and an average recorded.
3. All drills equipped with new Milwaukee SDS-Plus rotary drill bits.
4. Operators instructed to maintain consistent pressure and let the drill do the work.
5. Dust extractors were not utilized.
6. Technique emphasized to ensure fair comparison.

Performance Test Winner – Milwaukee

Milwaukee dominated three out of the four speed tests, earning an impressive overall score of 5. DEWALT’S 60V FlexVolt secured second place with an overall score of 15, excelling particularly with the 1-inch bit test. Hilti and Ridgid claimed third place with an overall score of 18. Metabo followed with a score of 21. The Metabo was not a remarkable tool, but was a consistent “power-house performer.”

Individual Test Results | Top 3

¼” Rotary Bit Results

• Milwaukee: 4.19 seconds
• DEWALT 60V: 4.63 seconds
• Hilti: 5.49 seconds

⅜” Rotary Bit Results

• Milwaukee: 4.93 seconds
• Ridgid: 5.24 seconds
• DEWALT 20: 5.88 seconds

½” Rotary Bit Results

• Milwaukee: 4.36 seconds
• Ridgid: 5.43 seconds
• Hilti: 5.57 seconds

1” Rotary Bit Results

• DEWALT 60V: 14.52 seconds
• Milwaukee: 21.63 seconds
• Metabo: 24.04 seconds

Note on DEWALT FlexVolt 60V Rotary Hammer

The DEWALT Flexvolt was an extremely powerful and heavy tool allowing it to shine in the 1-inch drill bit test and subsequent chipping evaluation.

Efficiency Evaluation | Normalized Run-time

Although run-time becomes less critical with sufficient battery capacity, we acknowledge it’s importance in specific scenarios such as with commercial users, installing numerous drop anchors in a day. With so many tools, battery voltages and sizes, we normalized run-time and investigated the efficiency of the tools energy available. Obviously some battery packs contain much more potential energy so it’s important to try and compare them based on the “size of the fuel tank”.

Efficiency Testing Procedure

1. Vacuums removed for this test.
2. All tools equipped with fresh batteries.
3. 1/2″ Milwaukee drill bits drilled to 3″ depth.
4. Operators instructed to maintain consistent pressure and let the drill do the work.
5. The total number of drilled holes were counted and scored.

Holes Drilled Per Watt-Hour – Winner Makita 18V

The Makita 18V drill claimed the top spot, surprising us all with it’s performance. This drill managed to complete 66.5 holes with a single 4 Ah battery with a 0.92 holes drilled per watt-hour.

Interestingly, the Makita 36-volt model, despite having twice the available watt-hours, only completed 82 holes, representing just a 23% increase in hole count which equated to only drilling 0.57 holes per watt-hour. This unique comparison between the two Makita drills highlights a design prioritization of efficiency vs power.

The Metabo 18 volt came in second place with 0.85 holes per watt-hour. Third place went to the DEWALT 20 volt with 0.82 holes per watt-hour.

Size and Weight – Not Used In Final Rankings

In the realm of SDS-Plus rotary hammers, size matters to some users. We measured the dimensions and weight of each drill, as tested (with Batteries / handle), and ranked them accordingly.

We felt the two most important factors for these drills were the weight and head length. Having a lightweight tool coupled with a compact size can be an important factor for some users. While we didn’t include this ranking in the final scoring we did account for the size and weight in our user experience rankings below. It’s interesting to see that most of the smaller / lighter tools didn’t perform as well as the heavier tools in the speed testing. Likely this is due to the size of the gear boxes, motors and housings.

In this category, the Kobalt drill boasted the shortest and lightest stature among all drills tested, clinching the top spot. Following closely in second place was the DEWALT 20V, which also showcased a compact form factor and lightweight design. The Ryobi drill secured third place in this ranking.

On-Board Dust Extractor Evaluation

On-board dust extractors are designed to be used as a system. Eight of these tools were sent with compatible on-board dust extractors to evaluate.

Dust Extractor Procedure

We tested the on-board dust extractors, ranking eight criteria:

1. Capacity – We drilled ½” x 3” holes until we saw dust “ant-hills” form around the hole. At that point we consider the capacity of the dust extractor full.
2. Visual inspection of capacity.
3. Filter cleaning – Self cleaning or manual function
4. Filter replacement – ease of removal.
5. Depth of hole with attachment.
6. Depth guide – ease of adjustment.
7. Replaceable head.
8. Weight.

On-Board Dust Extractor – Winner Hilti

The Hilti came in first place in the on-board dust extractor category. It was feature rich with its replaceable head, depth guide, and filter cleaning options. Despite clinching the top position, the team collectively noted that the dust canister could be improved by being translucent for better visibility, and the filter could be easier to detach from the canister.

In terms of “capacity” performance, the Hilti canister maintained dust extraction efficiency for 14 holes. Milwaukee drilled 10.5 holes, and Makita 40V managed 15 holes.  Surprisingly, the Metabo HPT drilled 21.5 holes, and the DEWALT 20V drilled 22 holes, but didn’t excel  in other feature comparisons.

User Experience – [Tie] Winner Hilti and Makita 40V

User experience (UX) encompasses the overall satisfaction and ease of use that a tool provides to its users. In this category, our team of Pro users provided subjective rankings for the user experience while handling these rotary hammers. This ranking was based on various factors experienced, including grip, balance, vibration, line of sight, ease of use, fatigue factor, and overall comfort.

The team identified four drills as top performers during testing. The Hilti and Makita were tied for first place, closely followed by a tie between the DEWALT 20V and Milwaukee 18V. All four of these tools exhibited commendable performance in our testing and were noted for their user experience.

Rotational Force | Bind Test – Not Ranked

When a drill binds, it has the potential to violently spin the tool around potentially injuring the user.
To assess the performance in binding situations, we conducted a subjective test by drilling a 1-inch diameter, 8-inch, deep hole in concrete and side load force.

3 Types of Safety Shut-Offs in Rotary Hammers

1. Accelerometer – An electronic component integrated into the tool that detects sudden rotation and initiates an automatic shutdown.
2. Mechanical – Utilizes a straightforward mechanical clutch mechanism whereby the tool continues to run, but the bit stops spinning when the clutch is engaged.
3. Electronic Overload – An electronic overload function is activated either before the mechanical clutch or during specific binding scenarios. This electronic overload serves to safeguard the electronics, motor, and battery, while also acting as a safety feature in certain situations.

Rotational Force Findings

During our testing, all of these tools effectively shut off when the tool was bound up and the user had a firm grip on both the tool and the auxiliary handle.

Standout tools featured all three safety mechanisms, predominantly found in higher-end models such as those from Bosch, Hilti, Makita (40-volt) and Milwaukee. These tools successfully incorporated all three mechanisms that we were able to activate during field testing.

Chipping Test – Winner DEWALT 60V

Our chipping testing methodology was primarily subjective in nature. We employed our drill testing blocks to conduct the chipping tests.

TBB Crew users utilized the rotary hammers to break up the test blocks, after which they provided feedback via a form detailing their chipping experience.

The consensus from our testing suggests that there’s a “secret sauce” combination of impact energy and beats per minute (BPM) that yields optimal chipping power. This mix of factors seems to be instrumental in achieving productive chipping results.

The DEWALT 60V was the largest and heaviest tool in the group and with 4.5 FT-LBS of energy, it’s no surprise that it excelled at chipping, taking first place

The DEWALT Flexvolt was a “jack hammer disguised as a drill  ~ TBB Crew Wes Bartosik

The Makita 40V came in second. It has tons of power and minimal vibrations felt, due to its well throughout decoupling. The Milwaukee 18V came in third place. It delivers an incredible amount of energy on impact and was very controllable while cutting scribe lines.

SDS-Plus Rotary Hammer | Price – Not Included In Final Scoring

Most manufacturers offer these rotary hammers in kit form, bundling the tool with a battery optimized for performance while maintaining a manageable weight. Achieving the best user experience hinges on finding the right balance between weight, balance, and power to accomplish tasks efficiently.

For your reference, we have listed bare tool pricing below, although this wasn’t factored into our final scoring. As an illustration of the cost range, the Kobalt is available as a bare tool for $99.00, while the Makita 40-volt model is priced at $589.00. Please refer to the attached chart for further details.

Best Cordless 1-Inch SDS-Plus Rotary Hammer – Winner Milwaukee 18V

While impact energy undoubtedly influences a tool’s performance, it’s crucial to recognize that it’s not the sole determinant of effectiveness. Other factors, such as RPM and BPM, also play significant roles in achieving the desired outcome for the user. Harmonizing impact energy, RPM, and BPM is essential to optimize the tool’s overall efficiency and effectiveness.

Decisions should be based on considerations related to ergonomics, safety, and mechanical performance. Balancing these aspects ensures that the tool not only performs well but also prioritizes the safety and user experience of the user.

It’s noteworthy that when ranking our categories, we assigned double weight to performance scores, considering it the most valuable category.

Milwaukee claimed the top spot in performance, secured second place in dust extraction, and ranked third in both user experience (UX) and chipping. Its overall performance stood out as the clear winner.

Second Place honors go to the Makita 40V.  This Makita excelled in UX, chipping and dust extraction. The Makita 40V was a favorite among the crew, tying with Hilti for the top spot in UX.

Hilti rounded out the podium in 3rd place.  The Hili was also heavily sought after by the crew and ranking first in the UX category, boasting the best dust extraction, and coming in eighth in performance testing and fourth in chipping.

Tied for fourth place was Metabo and DEWALT 60V. Metabo stood out with it’s second place in efficiency and scored well in both user experience and chipping. The DEWALT 60V was impressive in the chipping tests and performance.

Best Value 1″  SDS-Plus Rotary Hammer – Winner Ridgid

This category winner often strikes a chord with users as it showcases an SDS-Plus drill that performs admirably while being more budget-friendly. In many respects, it’s a category of significant importance, sometimes overshadowing the top-ranked contender, crowned king of our 1″ SDS-Plus Rotary Hammer Head-to-Head Test.

The Ridgid 18V, priced at $269 as a bare tool, claimed victory in this category. Despite landing in seventh place overall, it delivered commendable performance, securing a solid fifth place rank in our performance testing. We often refer to Ridgid as the “hidden gem” of the tool industry.

Best 1″ SDS-Plus Rotary Hammer | Closing Comments

1″ SDS-Plus rotary hammers are essential tools for contractors seeking efficient, versatile, and reliable solutions for drilling and hammering tasks in concrete and masonry materials.

We often receive inquiries about our final rankings and understand that there are numerous ways to compare tools.

Our primary goal during testing is to attain repeatable and consistent results. We make sure to share all the data from our tests so that users can re-rank the tools according to their preferences. If there’s a specific aspect you don’t find relevant, feel free to remove it from the matrix above and re-evaluate the rankings accordingly.

We hope you find this Head-To-Head comparison useful when considering the purchase of a 1″ cordless SDS-Plus rotary hammer. Please take a moment to explore our other Head-to-Head tests at ToolBoxBuzz.com.

Thanks, “the TBBCrew.”

Best 1-inch SDS-PLUS Rotary Hammer Video Review

Best Cordless 1 Inch SDS Plus Rotary Hammer – 2024 is a post from Tool Box Buzz

HILTI SL 10 22 Area Tower Light Review

Commercial job sites are benefitting from the cordless revolution. The hallways, corridors, and workspaces are no longer strewn with extension cords and dependent upon ‘temp power.’ The HILTI 22v Tower Light is a new entrant into the construction lighting field, joining Milwaukee, DEWALT, Ryobi, Makita, and others with tower lighting solutions.

The HILTI 22v Tower Light is part of the Hilti Nuron 22volt battery platform. We were anxious about how this light tower stacks up in the field.

Commercial builders work in spaces without permanent power lighting during the early production of finished spaces. This is because the permanent lighting depends on the trade rough-in and final inspections before those systems can operate. As a result, we know the right temporary lighting is essential to ensuring that we can work safely and effectively.

HILTI 22v Tower Light

The new HILTI 22v Tower Light configuration came with the following components

• The Area Light Tower SL 10-22 (#2374181)-
• Two (2) B22 255 Nuron Batteries (#2345534)
• Charger C 6-22 115v (#2260054)

HILTI 22v Tower Light – Specifications and Features

HILTI SL 10 22 Area Light Tower

5/5

Manufacturer: HILTI
Model number: SL 10 22 Area Light Tower
Power source: 22v battery or 120v ac
Weight: 20.8 Lb

For readers curious about its IP55 rating, the HILTI 22v Tower Light is dust-protected at a level that some dust might penetrate the equipment but will not interfere with the safe operation of the light. For liquid, the Area Tower Light can be sprayed with a ¼” water nozzle against the enclosure at any angle and will not have any harmful operational effects.

A Unique Light Design

The HILTI 22v Tower Light has a unique design for the lighting head. Many other light towers have LED panels that need to be aimed or a large reflector head that casts light in one direction. The HILTI L22 has a configuration containing 16 vertical LED strips along the circumference of the head. Each of these strips has 11 LEDs. In addition, the top of the light head has an additional pattern of LEDs. That way, the tower casts a true 360 degrees of uninterrupted light.

We took the SL10-22 to our commercial job site to see how well the Tower Light performed. The results were very impressive. The light pattern inside of the interior dark rooms was bright and seamless. In particular, the drywall trades were interested in the Tower Light for their taping and finishing. The light, when adjusted to its highest position, is out of the workers’ eyes, and one cannot tell any difference in intensity when looking at the pattern on the inside of a space with white walls. That type of space would be the place that would show any such lighting patterns.

In addition to the unique light head design, HILTI can shut off half of the light head pattern to only shine for 180 degrees of the perimeter. This allows for more controlled light patterns and doubles the battery life.

Adjustability

The HILTI SL22 light head is attached to a telescoping aluminum shaft controlled by two cam levers that allow you to choose your operating height. The cam levers are easy to use and provide fast and efficient height adjustment.

Another unique feature of the HILTI SL 22 is the extension height of the head above the floor. The full extension of the head is 6 feet 10 inches above the floor. This way, the light pattern is above most users’ eye level, allowing the light tower to be outside the focal point. That is a great feature when the user’s eyes are not overwhelmed by the light.

Light Output and Run-time

The light tower has three light output modes [low-medium-high] that put out 6,500 lumens at the highest setting.  When paired with the HILTI B 22-255 Li-ion battery, I experienced a  run-time of:

• High Setting – 5.5 hours, illuminating both halves of the fixture.
• Medium Setting – 8.5 hours illuminating both halves of the fixture.
• Low Setting – 11 hours illuminating both halves of the fixture.

We liked the ability to go through an entire 8-hour shift using one B 22-255 battery when using one-half of the fixture. With the entire fixture illuminated, the user will need at least one change of batteries during a shift. While we only used this light with the illumination on high and were pleased with the light output, we’d prefer an 8-hour run-time to avoid changing batteries mid-workday.

Corded or Cordless? – It’s your choice

The HILTI SL10-22 Light Tower can operate on either the DC batteries or by hooking up a 120v AC cord. The AC connector is behind a black service door at the unit’s base. While running on AC power, the Light Tower does not charge the battery. That is a feature we have seen on other manufacturers’ tower lights, and it would certainly be a great future feature for the SL 10-22.

Storage and Set-Up and Adjustability

We found that you can set the light up in seconds. You can extend the multi-directional light-head from 40” to 82”.  The unit weighs 20.8 lbs. It is not terribly heavy but takes up a 46” height x 11” width x 11” depth of storage space in the back of your pickup bed or trailer.

The SL 10-22 comes with a convenient carrying strap, and it is well-balanced to carry around.

HILTI SL 10-22 Price and Value

When you compare the HILTI Light Tower to other job site lighting solutions, it’s expensive, but I always consider tool purchases an investment.

We used to use Halogen lights for construction. I don’t even compare this ED Light Tower to an old-style Halogen light. Halogen work lights are outdated, they are cheaply made, and they don’t last; they run extremely hot, creating a fire hazard, and the bulbs break easily and are expensive to replace.

Today, there are a lot of cheap LED tripod options that typically sell on Amazon that cost $100  – $200 and put out 1000-2000 Lumens. I’ve used these lights, they need electric power to operate, and the first thing to break is the tripod stand and adjustment knobs. Within a year or two, one or both LEDs dim or stop working, indicating cheaper quality LEDs. High-quality LED temporary construction lighting solutions are supposed to be durable and last years and years.

The HILTI Light Tower costs 5 times or more than the cheap lights. But I put the comparison in the category of “you get what you pay for.” In the image, above, the temporary light in the corridor is a permanent light fixture that needs to be relocated and wired into a junction box every time you need the light repositioned. That is one very expensive way to provide light. But this is a common current practice. It costs nothing to relocate the HILTI Tower Light.

You get superior quality, significantly improved portability with the cordless options, better constructed LED diodes, a more durable, stable tripod platform, corded and cordless power options, and fast stow-able portability. Given reasonable care, this HILTI Light Tower should easily last you 8-10 years. When you amortize its cost over ten years, that’s a $120 per year investment.

The HILTI SL 10-22 Light/ Tower sells the way you buy it with an ala carte pricing structure. In my case, I got my system with the following components.”

• SL 10-22 Light Tower                       $ 548.00

• B 22 255 Batteries (2)                       $ 255.00 (ea.)
• C 6-22 115v Charger                          $ 128.00

Conclusion

We now look differently at LED job site lighting. What was once a luxury is now a necessity. LED lighting is a new industry standard for a good reason. It offers increased portability, functionality, and overall performance. And who doesn’t want improved job site safety while increasing overall efficiency and quality from vastly improved visibility.

HILTI 22v Tower Light Review is a post from Tool Box Buzz

Best Battery Powered 14″ Concrete Cutter (Cut-Off Saw) | Head-To-Head

A Concrete Cutter sometimes called a cut-off saw, masonry saw, road saw, “consaw,” or concrete saw is a hand-held tool designed to cut concrete, asphalt pavement, rebar, steel and plastic pipe. Typical uses include making openings in walls, floors, manhole structures, road surfaces, and curbs.

We all recognize that battery-powered saws require less maintenance, are easier to start, and forgo the need for the 50:1 fuel mixture.

Our industry is now experiencing an increased focus on the integration of battery-operated equipment across the job site, driving the discussion of gas tools vs. battery-powered tools. For us to even have this conversation we need to agree battery tools need to compete with gas in performance, power, and run-time.

We decided to perform a Head-to-Head test on four cordless concrete cutters (cut-off saws) to determine which one was the best saw and if these saws could compete with gas saws.

To give clarity to our testing we included the Husqvarna K770 gas saw, as a comparison standard.  Husqvarna has been making cut-off saws since 1958, and we chose the K 770 because it is a powerful, all-around concrete cutter with features that make it one of the best saws on the market.

Cordless Cut-Off Saw | Line-Up

Four manufacturers sent their cordless cut-off saws and saw blades.

NOTE – The Hilti cut-off saw is a 12″ saw but was allowed to participate in this test because it has a feature called OutCut, which allows it to cut at similar depths as the other three 14″ saws. To understand what OutCut is, the arm of the saw narrows to a smaller point compared to other saws and uses a smaller diameter flange-set for use with steel core diamond blades.

Hilti

• Model – DSH 700-22
• Max Cutting Depth – 4.75″
• Weight w/ battery provided – 31.0 LBS
• RPM – 5,080 RPMs
• Blade Size: 11-13/16
• Blade:  Hilti 12″ Equadist SPX 22-87947
• Battery Watt Hours – 255Wh x 2 batteries = 510 Wh

Husqvarna

• Model – K1 Pace 14″
• Max Cutting Depth – 5-5/8″
• Weight w/ battery provided – 30.8lbs
• RPM – 3,400 RPMs
• Blade Size: 14″
• Blade: S35S 14-inch Segmented Diamond Blade
• Battery Watt Hours – 749 Wh 
  

Makita

• Model – GEC01PL04
• Max Cutting Depth – 5″
• Weight w/ battery provided – 34.25 LBS
• RPM – 5,300 RPMs
• Blade Size” 14″
• Blade: 14″ Thin Kerf Diamond Blade Segmented General Purpose
• Battery Watt Hours – 288 Wh x 2 batteries = 576 Wh

Milwaukee

• XF315-2XC
• Max Cutting Depth – 5″
• Weight w/ battery provided – 33.35 LBS
• RPM –
• Blade Size: 14″
• Blade: Diamond Ultra 49-93-7540
• Battery Watt Hours – 576 Wh
  

Our Testing Criteria

Our team scored the cordless cut-off saws on eight criteria, each ranked independently, and the “Overall Best Cordless Cut-Off Saw” was determined using the combined test results.

We include but did not rank Watt-Hours Per Cut, and Best Value categories, but list them here for your own informational purposes. We did NOT include decibel testing since all of these saws are well over the OSHA rating for hearing protection.

Scoring Criteria – Cordless Cut-Off Saws

1. Concrete Cutting Test – Most lineal feet cut in concrete with embedded rebar [Ave. speed]
2. Rebar Cutting Test – Fastest cutter of five ganged #4 rebar. [Ave. speed]
3. Watt-hour per cut – we include this for your reference
4. Depth of Cut – Saws were ranks for cut capacity
5. Charging Time – We ranked the time it took to charge depleted batteries.
6. Ergonomics – Ergonomics is really important to users and an important category to consider when purchasing any power tool.
7. Features – We discuss stand-out features and team favorites
8. Size and Weight – Size matters and weight can get cumbersome. We measured the dimensions and scored weight of each concrete cutter as tested (with Batteries)
9. Best Value – Not ranked.
10. Price – The kit price at the time of publishing.

Concrete Test Blocks

We poured 3,500 psi concrete blocks, 12” x 24” x 4.5″ deep. We made the blocks deep enough for all cutter blades to be able to cut all the way through and allow ¼” for any blade wear.  Each concrete block also had two embedded # 4 rebar running along its length. 

Performance Testing  | Concrete with Embedded Rebar Cutting [Ave. Speed]

Each cordless concrete cutter was outfitted with a fresh battery and manufacturer specific blade. All of the manufacturers insisted on us using their branded blades with their saws, claiming that the blades were designed and optimized for the saw.

Run-time on cordless cut-off saws is important when discussing how battery and gas operate differently.  The number one question we are asked is,  “How do these saws compare to a gas concrete cutter? In order for us to address this question we included the  Husqvarna K770 gas saw as a comparison.

Run-time Test Procedure:

Without a test rig to eliminate these types of variables, it is very hard to have a controlled test. Technique is important and we recognize that we needed to let the tool do the work and not bog it down, which is why we designed our tests with the following criteria:

1. All 4 battery saws had two sets of fresh batteries and new Manufacturer blade.
2. The Husqvarna K770 had a full tank of gas and a fresh Milwaukee Diamond blade.
3. 4 operators per saw.
4. We used the 24″x12″x4.5″ concrete test blocks.
5. Each cut was timed and recorded.
6. Water was used on each cut.
7. Each operator made 3 cuts and swapped out to prevent fatigue. [Fatigued users tend to lean on the saw]
8. Every operator employed a “stepped” cutting method.
9. Every operator let the tool do the cutting, and listened to the motor for feedback. Operators applied pressure when the tool would allow it, and if the motor seemed like its bogging down they let up on the pressure.
10. The test ended when the saw battery died, and when the K770 ran out of gas.
11. The total slices [including partial cuts] were recorded for a total lineal foot measurement.

Note – The Husqvarna K770 gas saw has a fuel tank capacity of 0.95 qt.

Note on Step Cutting:

Step Cutting, also known as incremental cutting, involves making multiple incremental cuts with the saw until the overall desired depth of cut is reached. The number of cuts taken to reach the desired depth depends on the material being cut, the saw’s horsepower, and the operator’s experience.

• Step Cutting Increases Cutting Efficiency
• Step Cutting Increases Blade Life
• Step Cutting Results in Cleaner, Straighter Cuts

Note on Run-time Testing

With any cut-off saw you will experience varying results based on the material you’re cutting, you’re cutting style, operator experience, blade used, etc.  Ambient temperature also affects run-time. The more demand you put on the motor, for example leaning into the saw too much, the more Amps it will pull from the battery to keep the power output. The same effect can happen with a gas saw, except run-time is just not usually taken into consideration given the quicker refueling vs. recharging time.

Run-Time Testing | Winner –    Husqvarna

In all cases, it is necessary to supply two sets of batteries in order to compete with the expected run-time of a single tank of gas, on a gas saw. Manufacturers recognize this, and most are starting to sell these saws as a kit with two sets of batteries

The Husqvarna concrete cutter was able to complete 36 cuts, or 36 linear feet, in the concrete blocks, compared to the K770 gas saw which completed 30 cuts (30 linear feet). Second place was the Hilti cut-0ff saw with 29 cuts (29 linear feet), followed by the Makita with 24 cuts (24 linear feet) and Milwaukee with 23.5 cuts (linear feet).

One interesting fact was the average speed to complete these cuts.

The gas K770 saw completed 30 cuts  [30 lineal feet] with an average speed of 35.5 seconds.  The Milwaukee which brought up the rear with the least amount cut, was powerful enough to cut the concrete blocks even faster than the gas saw at 34.9 seconds.   The Husqvarna cut an average of 40.7 Seconds and both the Hilti and Makita tied with 45 seconds.

Note – photos in this article show K1 Pace with a smaller battery. This saw was photographed, and tested with a smaller battery, and later that week, tested again with a larger battery. The stats in this article are from the larger battery.

Watt-Hours Per Cut

While many sectors of the power tool industry have transitioned to battery power and cut the cord, there remains some specific tools like cut-off saws (concrete cutters) where there is no cord to cut.  Instead the power source is a small engine that runs on gas.  In order for the cordless cut-off saws to compete with the gas power standards, they need to not only have similar cutting power but also carry enough potential energy on board to get the job done. 

With all the tools running at different voltages, the quickest way to get a snapshot of how big a “gas tank” the tool has is to see how many Watt-Hours the batteries on board have.  We ran our endurance test with one battery swap so Watt-Hours are doubled in the chart.  By calculating Watt-Hours per cut we can get a good idea of how efficient the tool is at transforming that battery potential capacity into concrete cut. 

The Husqvarna had the largest battery of the group which helped it achieve top rank of cuts.  But it was also the second most efficient at using its “gas tank.” The Hilti had the least amount of Watt-Hours but cut the second most amount and was a standout as the most efficient with 35.17 Wh/cut.

The Makita and Milwaukee have exactly the same Watt-Hours on board and cut almost an identical amount concrete.  The Makita edged out a half cut over the Milwaukee which translates to a lower Wh/Cut value of 48.00.

An interesting observation when comparing the efficiency ranking of the tools is to compare them to the following speed and power rankings.  It’s clear there are always design tradeoffs between power and efficiency and these tools are no exception.

Performance Testing  |  Rebar Cutting [Ave. Speed]

Each cordless cut-off saw was outfitted with a fresh battery and the same brand specific abrasive cutting disk. One operator was used to make three cuts in five ganged #4 rebar for an average time.

Speed Test Procedure:

1. The same operator and timer teamed up to make 3 through cuts in five #4 rebar.
2. Each cut was timed separately.
3. The operator pushed as hard as the saw would allow.
4. The three cuts were averaged and scored.

Fastest Rebar Cutting |  Winner – Milwaukee

The Milwaukee was able to cut through five #4 rebar in. 7.78 seconds. Second place was the Makita at 10.3 seconds, and third was Husqvarna at 16.4 seconds, Hilti fourth at 17.0 seconds.

The team felt that this test, with all of the saw using an identical blade, was a great indicator of the available cutting power.

Depth Of Cut | Winner – Husqvarna

The depth of cut on a saw is important to all users. Husqvarna had the deepest depth of cut with 5-5/8 inches. Second place was the Makita and Milwaukee both with 5 inches, followed by the smaller Hilti saw at 4-3/4″. Husqvarna’s unique design where the arbor is offset from the drive band allowed for this impressive cutting depth.

Power Cutter Ergonomics | Winner – Husqvarna

The ergonomics evaluation in this section is purely subjective and based on the opinions of the testing crew. After a full day of running performance tests, the team sat down and ranked each tool in several categories on a score of 1-4 [1 being the best]. For the ergonomics evaluation, the team evaluated the following criteria:

1. Grip
2. Balance
3. Line of Sight
4. Vibration
5. Blade change
6. Battery change

The Husqvarna was the clear winner and a team favorite with final ergonomic score of 9. It won three categories with top score for grip, balance and line of sight.

The team did not like that the Husqvarna does not have rollers but all agreed that it had excellent vibration damping, excellent balance, was the smoothest cutting and its streamlined design contributed to its excellent line of sight. It was very obvious to the team that Husqvarna has been making these cutters for a long time, and the form factor of their battery powered and gas powered saws is very similar.

Second in ergonomics was a tie between the Hilti and Milwaukee. Hilti took tops in vibration, and scored second in balance. Milwaukee came in second in grip, line of sight and blade change.

The team liked the Hilti grip and balance and felt it had a really good line of sight. All of us felt that it was a smooth cutting saw  and was one of the easiest saws to start and operate. The only criticism was that the batteries tucked under the tool and are not as easy to insert or remove compared to the others.

Milwaukee is a powerful cutting saw that you can lean on. It has a nice grip, excellent line of sight, great balance, good battery removal but is a bit bulky and heavy.  The Milwaukee saw has no visible decoupling  but had surprisingly low vibration. Milwaukee does isolate the drive systems gear box to minimize vibration.

Makita which scored tops in blade change and had very easy battery changes. However its bulky size, weight, and uneven balance hindered its ergonomics score. The Makita had the easiest blade change, was a super powerful saw, it was the only saw that you never had to back off on while cutting.

While cutting concrete the Makita seemed to vibrate quite a lot. However when more force was applied the vibration lessened considerably. Basically the user was forced to “preload” the decoupling spring to prevent blade chatter. This seemed to be a non-issue in rebar cutting and led us to wonder if it was due to the blade more than the saw itself.

Cordless Concrete Cutter Features | Winner – Hilti

We considered 8 features on these cut-off saws:

1. Tool Activation
2. Water connection
3. Decoupling [vibration]
4. Blade Brake
5. Wheels
6. Handles [Multiple Hand Placement]
7. Indicator Light
8. Arbor Lock
9. LED Light

Hilti took first place in features with a top score in tool activation, blade brake, had the best wheels, and second best water connection. Second place went to the Makita with a well designed arbor lock, water connection and the only saw to feature an LED light. Third place in features was a tie between Husqvarna and Milwaukee.

Husqvarna has an electronic brake called “X-Halt,” which  stops the blade in a fraction of a second if a kickback occurs. The function cannot fully prevent personal injury from a kickback, but it decreases the risk.

Husqvarna had the most informative user interface, great decoupling and tool activation.  It will also time out [turn off] after 3-minutes, a time period we feel is too short.

Makita had the best auxiliary handle in terms of the amount of usable space or hand positions. It is also the only tool in the test to feature a push-button arbor lock.

Makita is equipped with “Active Feedback-Sensing Technology,” which electronically turns off the motor if the rotation of the cutting wheel is suddenly forced to stop. It also features Extreme Protection Technology, which is engineered for improved dust and water resistance.

No one on the team liked how the Makita lock-off button is actuated. This single-sided safety switch  [set up for right-hand thumb] is difficult for left-handed users to activate. Instead of a safety switch integrated into the palm grip which naturally gets depressed when holding the tool the users must push this button with their thumb 90 degrees offset to the spine of the tool. It’s neither intuitive, nor comfortable to actuate, and we all fumbled with it.

Milwaukee had a fantastic blade brake, and incorporates their RAPID STOP technology to help prevent damage from kickbacks and unexpected handling behavior. It has a unique trigger activated water valve which turns on or shuts of the water with the trigger.  This initially received high praise from the review team but later in testing proved to be a hindrance due to erratic behavior likely due high water pressure.

The Milwaukee states in the manual that the MAX water pressure for the tool is rated for 60 psi. We measured 97 psi at our test site. Milwaukee needs to address this, as contractors do not want to add an additional accessory, like a pressure reducer, to their set up.

Bluetooth Functionality

Husqvarna has built-In connectivity for asset management, allowing you to monitor location, run-time, service intervals and receive wireless updates.

Milwaukee has One-Key connectivity which allows for fleet management, location tracking and lockout.

Power Cutter Weight | Winner – Husqvarna.

Weight can cause fatigue with cut-off saws. The lightest saw was the Husqvarna weighing in at 30.8 lbs. Second lightest saw was the Hilti at 30.1 lbs, third went to Milwaukee at 33.35 followed by Makita at 34.25 lbs.

Note – the Husqvarna K770 gas saw has a weight of  26.12 lbs. without gas.

Best Concrete Cutter Battery Charging Time | Winner – Milwaukee and Hilti

In order to achieve gas saw performance you will need two sets of batteries. The theory is to have a battery(s) on the charger while you are working. This reduces downtime and maximizes your productivity. That being said, will the battery reach a full charge before you need it? The answer to that depends on how much cutting you are doing at one time.

The fastest battery charging time was a tie between Hilti and Milwaukee MX battery, both with charging times of 45 minutes. Its important to note that the Hilti ran off of two B22-255 batteries and to achieve this time you will need two chargers. Otherwise you’ll have to double this time.

Husqvarna was third with a 55 minute time, thanks to its “express charge” feature on the charger. This feature allows the user to press a button on the front of the charger to activate. However, you don’t want to fast charge batteries on a regular basis because it’s hard on the cells. A standard charge time is about 75 minutes. The express charge is there for when you need it. We are based in the North East USA and our electrical system is based on a 110V AC standard.  Its important to note for European customers that the Husqvarna charger is able to perform slightly faster on the 220V AC standard and give a 45 minute express charge.

The Makita dual charger simultaneously charges both Makita 40V 8.0Ah batteries at the same time in 76 minutes.

Best Priced Power Cutter | Winner – Hilti

These four saws are unquestionably pricey tools. In order for these saws to achieve gas performance you will need two sets of batteries. Replacement blades on these machines runs approximately $150.

The Milwaukee and Makita saws are offered in a kit that includes two sets of batteries and a charger. The Milwaukee comes with two batteries, whereas the Makita comes with four (the saw requires two batteries to function).

Our conclusion is that these cut-off saws all require two batteries to match one tank of gas. For pricing we included the saw, two sets of batteries, and a charger for the Husqvarna and Hilti.

The winner of the best price is the Hilti DHS 700-22 priced in our kit form at $2,493.00

• Tool cost: $1,183.00
• 4 batteries:  $243.00 each
• 2 chargers: $169.00 each

Second place was the Makita Power Cutter Kit totaling $2,699.00 and third was Milwaukee, sold as a kit for $2,999.00.

The most expensive cut off saw was the Husqvarna which when added all together was $3,996.00. This extremely high price is due to the cost of the batteries. The B750X battery is $939.00 each and when adding in two of them it contributes 50% of the total price. At this cost users could almost purchase two competitor saws for the price of the Husqvarna.

Overall Best 14″ Cordless Cut-Off Saw (Concrete Cutter) | Winner – Husqvarna

Its important to note that ALL of these cut-off saws performed well and were extremely close. Two of the manufacturers Hilti and Makita also have huge power tool platforms that their batteries will interchange with.  The other two Husqvarna and Milwaukee, only have a few dozen tools currently that their batteries will power.

The overall Best Cordless Cut-Off Saw in our testing was the Husqvarna with a score of 21.  Hilti came in second with 23 and Milwaukee just one point behind with 24.

Note: Given the number of categories scored for our overall ranking we decided to double the value of our performance tests.  Both the Concrete Endurance and Rebar Speed scores were multiplied by a factor of 2 in the final chart.  We feel that the cutting endurance and cutting power of these tools carry the most weight and importance to the potential end user.

The Hilti saw is technically a 12″ power cutter, had the shallowest depth of cut, but clearly punched above its weight in this test with a great feature set, low weight, and impressive run-time and speed scores.

The Husqvarna K1 Pace power cutter was a team favorite and a clear winner with top scores in five out of nine categories. It is a lightweight, well balanced cut off saw with great runtime, functionality and line of sight.

The Makita saw was heavy and powerful. It was the only saw we NEVER had to let up on and you can actually lean into cuts with. It has excellent features and ergonomics, a generous depth of cut and was second fastest in our metal cutting test.

The Milwaukee MX saw is a Gen 2 saw and was a speed demon when cutting metal averaging almost 3-seconds faster than the next concrete cutter. It too was a powerful cutter with an excellent depth of cut, great price with good features and ergonomics. The water connection issue hurt the MX saw and kept it from standing alone in 2nd place.

Best Value Cordless Concrete Cutter | Winner – Hilti and Milwaukee

Best value is typically awarded to the saw that performed well and is lowest or low in price. The Hilti and Milwaukee were close in scores and $500 apart in cost. With regard to performance the Milwaukee power cutter performed slightly better than the Hilti. One tool did well in concrete endurance, and the other in cutting speed.

The Hilti cordless cut-off saw surprised us all in its performance and frankly price. Hilti has historically been at the top of the pricing charts in all of our head-2-Head tests. The bottom line is both concrete cutters have great feature set, good ergonomics, and excellent charging times which is important to keep you in the “cutting” game.

Either of these cutters are great! ~ Rob

Closing Thoughts

The biggest issue with cordless cut-off saws is charge time. It’s our opinion that contractors who cut concrete with 2 tanks of gas or less a day are in the “sweet-spot” to convert to a battery power cutter.  If you are cutting all day and using 5 to 7 tanks of gas you should stay with a gas cutter or invest in more batteries.

Speaking of batteries, the Hilti and Makita tools both use batteries that are compatible with a wide variety of smaller tools (Hilti’s Neuron line and Makita’s 40v XGT line). This could be a factor in purchasing decisions.

Lastly, charge time, and power to charge is a consideration.  Many of these batteries require 45 minutes to charge, and  you also need to consider how remote you are working. Do you have access to electricity or an inverter to charge your batteries?

We get lots of comments about how we make the final rankings. There are dozens of ways to compare tools, our goal when testing is to achieve repeatable, consistent results. We share ALL the data from our tests, so you can re-rank the tools however you want. If you don’t care about an item we ranked? No problem. Remove that from the matrix above and re-rank them.

Hopefully you’ll find this Head-To-Head useful when considering purchasing a larger cordless power cutter, or comparing them to gas models.

Please take some time and check out our other head-to-Head tests at ToolBoxBuzz.com.

Thanks, “the TBBCrew.”

Best Cordless 14″ Cut-Off Saw (Concrete Cutter) | Video Review

Best Cordless 14″ Cut-Off Saw (Concrete Cutter) | Head-To-Head is a post from Tool Box Buzz

Best Cordless Impact Driver

There’s no doubt that Impact Drivers have completely changed the construction industry and drastically improved both productivity and quality. Impact drivers allow users to install screws, structural fasteners and small bolts more efficiently than a drill. Impact drivers drastically reduce broken fasteners, stripped screw heads and costly delays. An impact driver relies on a hammer and anvil mechanism to deploy rotational force when fastener resistance is encountered.   

In our Best Cordless Impact Driver Head-To-Head test, we’ve selected 19 full-size impact drivers from a wide range of manufacturers. We invited all of the major manufacturers to participate, with some brands sending multiple impact drivers.

 

Features Qualitative Scoring Results
MFG	Score	Rank
Bosch	1	1
Makita 18v	2	2
Makita 40v	2	2
Skil	2	2
Festool	3	5
FLEX	3	5
Kobalt	3	5
Metabo HPT 18DC	3	5
Metabo HPT 18DBD	3	5
Metabo HPT 36v	3	5
Milwaukee	3	5
Ridgid	3	5
Ryobi	3	5
DEWALT	4	14
Hilti	4	14
Metabo 18 LT	4	14
Metabo 18LTX	4	14
FEIN	5	18
Hart	5	18

WP DataTables

Best Size and Weight | Winner DEWALT

Size matters to users, in this case, they want a smaller, compact impact driver that still has the power for the applications they need to deploy it in. Compact also means that the tool can be used in more situations, think of tight spot applications like sistering floor joists with a 5 or 6-inch fastener,  in between joist bays. We felt the two most important factors for an impact driver were the weight and head length.  Having a lightweight tool when working overhead, coupled with a compact size that can fit into small openings is a huge win.

To determine a final ranking for size and weight, each driver was weighed without the battery and the head length, from bit holder/collet to back was measured.  Each of these values were ranked separately and then combined into a single factor to determine the winner.   The DEWALT was the most compact impact driver of the bunch. It measures 3.9″ and weighs 2.1 lbs and is 1/2″ smaller than the 2nd place Metabo HPT 18DC  which measures 4.51 inches and measures 2.0 lbs.  Third place was the Makita 18V measures 4.53  inches and weighs 1.9 lbs.

An interesting fact is that all of the tools weigh from 1.9 lbs. to 3.3 lbs.

MFG	Length (in)	Weight (lb)	Rank
DEWALT	3.94	2.10	1
Metabo HPT DC	4.51	2.00	2
Makita 18v	4.53	1.90	3
Milwaukee	4.48	2.20	4
Makita 40v	4.77	2.20	5
Metabo 18V LTX	5.10	2.10	6
Ridgid	5.02	2.20	7
Festool	5.17	2.12	8
Metabo HPT 36v	4.52	2.50	8
Hilti	5.44	2.20	10
Skil	4.92	2.47	10
FLEX	4.68	2.70	12
Kobalt	5.27	2.40	12
FEIN	6.00	2.20	14
Metabo HPT DBD	5.04	2.90	15
Hart	5.82	2.50	16
Ryobi	5.60	2.55	16
Metabo 18 LT	5.64	2.60	18
Bosch	5.82	2.60	19

WP DataTables

Best Cordless Impact Price  | Winner Skil

Price is undoubtedly an important consideration when buying tools, especially for those of you who are just starting out in the trades. We can certainly agree on that and also agree that the majority of contractors have strong brand loyalty and would rather continue with their current battery platform than venture out and create a new line of cordless power tools.

We did not include the price in our scoring criteria but included bare tool pricing for you to use as needed.

The best-priced impact driver was the  Skil coming in at $69.99 bare tool. The second lowest price was the Hart at $77.85 and the third was the Bosch at $99.00. The team all agrees that the Skil and Hart impact drivers fall into the DIY category for users.

There are several pro-grade impact drivers in this test, I’ll use the Festool as an example. In their research and testing Festool found that the most frequent failure point on impact drivers was the anvil mechanism, so they adjusted the shape and material hardness of their anvil to increase the lifespan of the tool. They also decreased the internal strike speed (BPM) so it was less likely to break.

Festool also incorporated a longer trigger which allows for finer control of the variable speed trigger making it easier to manually control slow speed on hardware attachment. The moral of the story here is that pro-grade tools are designed to last longer, for us PROs a tool is an investment that is needed for our livelihood – invest wisely!

Best Cordless Impact Driver Head-To-Head | 2023 is a post from Tool Box Buzz

 HILTI 22V Nuron, Brushless D-Handle Jigsaw Model SJD 6-22

HILTI SJD 6-22 Cordless Jig Saw

4.5/5

Manufacturer: HILTI
Model number: HILTI SJD 6-22
Price: $239.oo
Power source: Cordless (Li-Ion)
Motor size: 22V
Weight: 4.9 lbs (Bare tool)

Features and Specifications | HILTI SJD 6-22

Features:

• Variable-speed trigger with lock
• Keyless “push in, click” chuck
• LED light
• Integrated dust blower design
• Removable vacuum “suction adaptor”
• Anti-splinter insert
• Orbital blade action 

Specifications:

• Model: SJD 6-22
• Power Input: 22 Volts
• Total SPM settings: 6
• Total orbital settings: 3
• Bevel range: +/- 45 degrees
• Blade Type: T shank
• Strokes Per Minute: 0-3,000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-3/32″
• Sheet steel (max) thickness: 13/32 in.
• Wood & composites max thickness: 5.9 in.
• Dust Port Diameter: 1.08 in.
• Weight: 4.9 lbs (tool only)

Design & Key Features

Blade Setting Adjustments

The HILTI SJD 6-22 jigsaw comes with a lot of features, many of which are standard. The saw has an adjustable dial for controlling the blade strokes per minute (SPM) which is smartly designed into the rear tool body under the D handle. This “set and forget” feature allows the user to focus on the cut and not the trigger with minimal risk of accidently hitting (and changing) the SPM setting mid cut. The trigger also easily locks via an easily reached, ambidextrous thumb switch. SPM settings range from 800rpm (setting 1) to 3000rpm (setting 6). This saw also has a Stroke-based soft start, starting at 75 SPM before ramping up to the desired SPM setting.

Strokes Per Minute (SPM) setting dial

In addition to tailoring the SPM setting to the job at hand, you can also set the orbital (back and forth blade motion) to math your current task. The orbital action of the blade can be set from 0 (no action) to 3 (High). It is done using a lever on the front left side of the tool body just behind the blade guard. It is out of the way during cutting operations and was firm but not difficult to operate. This is a feature found on most PRO level tools so we were glad HILTI included it as a core feature on their SJD 6-22 Jigsaw.

Visibility Features

The saw comes with an effective anti-splinter insert.  We’ve included it in visibility features because it actually proved helpful in aligning our cuts using the forward cutting channel. It was easy to use the front of the anti splinter blade channel to guide along our cut lines. Although it’s designed to be transparent, it had little effect on the overall usefulness of the insert. The tool body also has a powerful LED light well placed on the leading edge of the tool body centered above the blade contact point. It easily illuminates the line-of-sight without creating distracting or obstructive shadow lines. It is on a 10 second timer from trigger release.

Anti-splinter insert used for guide-line cut

Safety Design Features

The blade guard can only be used when the plate is set to 90 degrees.  However we rarely use the blade guard as it affects the overall line of sight (like most guards) and doesn’t pose a real safety risk if removed. The anti-splinter insert seals the forward edge of the base plate and the tool body protruded past the saw edge. This means the blade has very little exposure for injury even without the guard.

Besides the blade guard discussed above, the HILTI SJD 6-22 also has a few under the Radar but effective, integrated safety design features. These include a rapid blade brake and Active Vibration Reduction (AVR). While the rapid blade brake is pretty straightforward, the AVR is a bit less obvious. Simply put the AVR is an internal design using vibration resistant materials meant to dampen internal component-based vibrations to increase tool longevity and decrease operator fatigue. Importantly, it is not an active feature and will not prevent tool “chatter” if the user doesn’t apply consistent pressure to the cutting material.

HILTI also has a two-part option for fall protection mounting on the SJD 6-22. A 15 lb. rated retaining strap is secured to the tool via an insert on either side of the battery slide housing. screws are tightened with the Nuron battery removed to secure the strap in place. Next, a carabiner on the 15 lb. rated tool tether bungee cord can be hooked to the retaining strap and a secure anchor point. While we hardly use a jigsaw in a way that requires a fall arrest strap, it’s nice to at least have the option should the job (and OSHA regulations) require it.

Dust Control & Extraction

Baseplate & Suction Adapter

Dust control is as critical for maintaining a clean, safe job site as it is for ensuring a clear line-of-sight while cutting. The HILTI SJD 6-22 has a innovate design that incorporates two channels from the blade to the back of the baseplate for the purpose of dust collection. A removable suction adapter clicks in to the channels, allowing the user to hook up a shop vac to this jig saw. This is one of the most interesting baseplates we’ve seen on any saw.

And it works extremely effectively. The blade guard seemed to help channel the suction from the two channels and improved the overall dust collection. Additionally, underneath the saw, there is a small electrical receptacle which powers the SJD DRS-6A dust removal module. This is an additional dust accessory that we didn’t get a chance to test out for this review.

Integrated Dust Blower

Additionally, the HILTI SJD 6-22 jig saw incorporates an integrated dust blower feature into its design. This is a common feature among PRO-level jigsaws and one that we’ve come to very much appreciate. The saw redirects a jet of air created by an internal fan blade towards the blade contact point. This jet of air helps blow dust away from line-of-sight when the motor is running. It worked on par with other PRO jigsaws we’ve used.

Overall Performance & Ergonomics

Ease of Cutting

The SJD 6-22 jig saw uses HILTI’s rock solid Nuron 22V battery powerplant to deliver smooth and impressive overall power. We used it primarily to do a range of curved cuts in 3/4 in. plywood as well trimming some stair stringers. One positive that really impressed was the SJD 6-22’s ability to maintain perpendicular blade angles despite the radius of the cut. The anti-splinter insert somewhat reduced tear out. It also provided a consistently clear line-of-sight which allowed us to maintain accurate, drift-free cuts whether flat or vertical. The magnesium base stayed rock solid and the overall tool balance (with a 22-85 Nuron battery) made it easy to mostly avoid chatter. It was expectedly a bit “rear-heavy” with a larger B22-170 Nuron battery.

Ergonomics & Adjustability

The blade ejection lever, orbital setting switch, and SPM dial were also well placed and felt secure but not stiff. Of note, the blades can be directly inserted into the blade retention slot. The lever only needs to be used to release and replace the blades. The click-in blades were convenient compared to other jig saws that require the blade lever to be pulled to both load and unload the blades. We always appreciate design features that save us time.

Blade Ejection Lever

The switches, to include the trigger lock switch was easy to reach mid cut. We loved the design and overall feel of the grip. The rubber over mold was very comfortable and, when combined with the smooth handle lines, limited tool fatigue more than we expected.

Variable Speed Trigger & Thumb Lock Switch

Baseplate Adjustability

One rare frustration with the HILTI SJD 6-22 is that it requires an Allen wrench to adjust the baseplate angle. Tool free adjustment is always easier and more time efficient on the job site or in the shop. In the Hilti SJD 6-22’s case, you need a small Allen wrench. To make things more complicated, there is no on-board tool storage for the required Allen wrench. This would have been an easy design feature to integrate into the tools body or baseplate design. It’s a noticeable weak spot in an otherwise ingenious baseplate design.

Allen bolt (centered) for base plate bevel adjustment

Final Thoughts | HILTI SJD 6-22

The HILTI SJD 6-22 is an extremely capable and comfortable D-handle jig saw. We appreciated the well located and secure controls as well as the great line-of-sight picture. The construction quality is excellent per HILTI’s high standards, and this jigsaw feels built to last on the job site. The SJD 6-22 exemplified excellent power & battery life, providing smooth flat and vertical cuts while maintaining a consistent blade position. The dust collection features performed very well too. It is a feature rich tool with a great customer support team backing it up. Yes, we weren’t fans of the tool-required baseplate design, but it was a minor takeaway. The HILTI SJD 6-22 will run you $279 but it is worth it for a product that works exceptionally well and is built to last!

HILTI 22V Jig Saw Review is a post from Tool Box Buzz

Hilti 22V Nuron Cordless Brushless Hammer Drill/Drivers (Models SF 4H-22 & SF 6H-22)

Hilti 22v 4H & 6H Hammer Drill/Drivers

4.5/5

Manufacturer: Hilti
Model number: SF 4H-22 & SF 6H-22
Power source: Cordless (Li-Ion)
Motor size: 22V
Weight: 2.9 & 3.7 lbs

Features and Specifications | Hilti 22V Cordless Drills

Features (SF 4H-22):

• LED light molded into tool base
• Long-life brushless motor
• All-Metal Chuck
• Hammer Drill Mode
• Integrated Active Torque Control (ATC)
• Product warranty against parts and manufacturing irregularities for 20 years
• Service is free of charge up to 2 years, including wear & tear, pick-up and delivery

Specifications (SF 4H-22):

• Power Input: 22V
• Dimensions (LxWxH): 7.1 x 2.7 x 8.6 in
• RPMs(Gear): 610 (1) or 2100 (2)
• Max Torque (soft or hard joint): 314 or 549 in-lb
• Max. Chuck Opening (in.): 0.5
• Total Gears: 2
• Torque Increments: 15
• Tool body weight (lbs): 2.9

Features (SF 6H-22):

• Ambidextrous side handle
• LED light molded into tool base
• Long-life brushless motor
• All-Metal Chuck
• Hammer Drill Mode
• Integrated Active Torque Control (ATC)
• Product warranty against parts and manufacturing irregularities for 20 years
• Service is free of charge up to 2 years, including wear & tear, pick-up and delivery

Specifications (SF 6H-22):

• Power Input: 22V
• Dimensions (LxWxH): 8.2 x 2.7 x 8.5 in
• RPMs(Gear): 490 (1) or 2000 (2)
• Max Torque (soft or hard joint): 575 or 752 in-lb
• Max. Chuck Opening (in.): 0.5
• Total Gears: 2
• Torque Increments: 15
• Tool body weight (lbs): 3.7

Overall Performance

Let’s start off by pointing out what is different about these hammer drills. At first glance they appear to be extremely similar. From the number of torque increments and gears, to most of the features they include. But most of differences are under the surface. The Hilti SF 6H-22 boasts slightly larger internal gears. This means a couple things; it’s a bit heavier (0.8 lbs), boasts more overall torque (200-250 in-lbs), and has lower RPMs. Importantly, the Hilti SF 6H-22 is also designed with a removable ambidextrous side handle. The Hilti SF 4H-22 does not offer a side handle feature since it’s meant for lighter duty use. But is no means incapable tool. It still features a smooth functioning hammer drill option. Both drill/drivers operate off Hilti’s Nuron 22V battery platform and offer a full-range of settings up to and including a hammer drill mode. They are both powerful and smooth to operate.

Hilti SF 4H-22 Impressions

For normal jobsite tasks, such as using a paddle bit to drill stud through holes or a hole bit for recessed lighting cut outs, either drill/driver works great. The 4H-22 triggered the ATC more frequently than the 6H-22 for tougher material tasks although infrequently. These included using HSS bits on steel angle & beams (up to 3/8 in. material) and drilling 9/16 in. diameter anchor bolt holes in concrete (in hammer drill mode). The clutch Torque increments offer you a range from roughly 13 to 84 in-lbs, giving you a precise ability to not over-torque fasteners. Combine the clutch settings with a variable speed trigger and the range of settings are infinite.

Hilti SF 6H-22 Impressions

The SF 6h-22 handled many of these tasks flawlessly. While the ATC function (more on that in a bit) did kick on (really only when drilling through steel) we finished our jobs without real delay. And the optional side handle made applying downward pressure while in hammer drill mode much easier and ergonomically friendly. Unlike other drill/drivers on the market, the handle only has two options; left or right. It clamps directly onto the top of the drill body and was easy to reverse and/or remove. The only real difference between this drill and its predecessor (the SF 6H-A22) is a slight increase in hard joint max torque (708 in-lbs vs. 752 in-lbs) and an upgrade to the Nuron battery system (more on that in a bit). It was rugged and well balanced as we’ve come to expect from Hilti tools.

LED Light

The Hilti SF 4H-22 and SF 6H-22 both feature a single LED light integrated into the base of the tool. It is adequately bright but has the normal limitations of a bottom mounted light; it casts upwards shadows which can complicate a user’s line of sight. The LED light is sometimes also blocked by the tool body. Lastly, the LED light has no variable brightness setting like those found on other hammer drills. Not a huge deal but worth noting. If able, we’d love to see Hilti find a way to include at least a second top-mounted LED light.

Battery Life

We are big fans of the new Nuron battery line-up. We covered it in a full-feature article when it was first launched. They deliver impressive power and the batteries don’t run out quickly. We used a Hilti B22-85 battery (4.0 Ah) Pack with both drill/drivers. even with the higher power SF 6H-22 we completed a 7-hr on-site day on a single battery. We used the 6H-22 primarily for drilling with standard and paddle bits in soft framing lumber. At the end of the day we were down to our last battery bar.

Key Design & Safety Features

Ergonomics & Adjustability

The ergonomics for both Hilti hammer drills is nearly identical – and great. The both feature an extremely solid and comfortable rubber over-mold grip on the front and back of the handle. The weight was well balanced with a battery, although still slightly top heavy on the SF 6H-22. The thumb forward-reverse switch is easy to reach. We also appreciated that the variable speed trigger had no noticeable slop or looseness and was incredibly responsive.

The adjustable bezel ring for the torque increments is well contoured to the main body of the drill. It has good grip with the molded indents and because it is a little over an inch in depth, it was easy to grip even when wearing gloves on a chilly jobsite. It turns firmly which we like because it made it easier to dial in the right clutch setting. The gear setting switch is also top mounted. This makes it more convenient to see which setting the tool is adjusted to without having to stop a task as often. The raised body design in front of and behind the switch offer protection from striking and breaking the switch which has happened on other hammer drills we’ve used.

Like the torque increment adjustment bezel, the chuck is easy to grip with gloves. It has a nice diamond checked grip and is also a little over an inch deep. The all-metal construction is on par with other manufacturers and is designed to surely hold up well over time. The checked grip pattern is effective and comfortable with bare hands too.

Active Torque Control (ATC)

This is an essential feature for a PRO-caliber tool. We’ve used drills before that didn’t have this feature and tweaked a wrist when the bit flute got hung up on the cutting material. When the bit stops the drill takes the force and keeps on turning, taking your wrist along with it. ATC is an electronic feature that recognized when the torque is transferred to the tool body and quickly stops the motor from turning. It’s a wrist saver for sure!

Hilti Support Services

Sometimes we mention warranties or support services, but rarely does it get it’s own section. However, Hilti excels in this area. This is because of Hilti’s duration and follow-through on backing up their tools. Service, including wear & tear, pick-up and deliver, is free of charge up to 2 years. Yes, including wear and tear! And the support for defects extends to 20 years. And our experience with Hilti in the past has proved them to be a no-hassles company to deal with. This makes the sometimes more expensive investment usually less risky.

Final Thoughts | Hilti 22V Cordless Drills

The Hilti 22V Cordless Drills, Models SF 4H-22 & SF 6H-22, are well-balanced, high-performance, and built to withstand all job site conditions. They are 100% pro-level! They check all the boxes we look for in a job site cordless drill by offering ample power, effective ATC protection, good battery life, and a limitless range of torque options through two gears, 15- clutch increments, and a variable speed trigger. Plus, both drills have safety strap mounting slots for essential overhead work safety. If you are looking for a new cordless tool line up or have already bought in to Hilti’s new Nuron line of tools, then don’t wait. At $149 (4H-22) and $199 (6H-22) they are on par with prices for other PRO-level tools. If you frequently drill metal, stone, or concrete with a hand drill then we recommend you spring for the SF 6H-22.

Hilti 22V Cordless Drill/Driver Review is a post from Tool Box Buzz

Best 18V-24V Cordless Reciprocating Saw Head-To-Head |2022

Over 70 years ago (1951 to be exact) Milwaukee Tools introduced the first reciprocating saw called the SAWZALL. Since then technology has advanced dramatically. Currently, there is a plethora of full-size cordless reciprocating saws that are being used on millions of job sites every day!

Demolition contractors, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, mechanical contractors (both residential and commercial), and even firefighters are among the users. We can’t think of another power instrument that touches so many diverse trades than the reciprocating saw.

Cordless Reciprocating Saw Line Up

Fifteen manufacturers sent us their best cordless reciprocating saw on their 18v-24v platforms. We received the following 17 reciprocating saws for this Head-To-Head.

Craftsman Reciprocating Saw

• Model: CMCS351B
• Voltage: 20V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3200 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/8″
• Weight: 6.92 LBS
• Price: $99.00

DEWALT Reciprocating Saw

• Model: DCS386B
• Voltage: 20V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/8″
• Weight: 7.7 LBS
• Price: $169.00

FLEX Reciprocating Saw

• Model: FX2271-Z
• Voltage: 24V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 10.67 LBS
• Price: $199.00

Hart Reciprocating Saw

• Model: HPRS25
• Voltage: 20V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3200 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 5.0 LBS
• Price: $115.00

Hilti Reciprocating Saw

• Model: SR 6-22 #2240583
• Voltage: 22V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 2600 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 6.8 LBS
• Price: $299.00

Kobalt Reciprocating Saw

• Model: KXRS 124B-03
• Voltage: 24V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3100 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 6.4 LBS
• Price: $149.00

Kobalt Reciprocating Saw

• Model: KRS 224B-03
• Voltage: 24V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3100 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 6.0 LBS
• Price: $129.00

Makita Reciprocating Saw

• Model: XRJ05Z
• Voltage: 18V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 8.2 LBS
• Price: $179.00

Metabo Reciprocating Saw

• Model: 602267850
• Voltage: 18V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 2700 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 5.5 LBS
• Price: $179.00

Metabo HPT  Reciprocating Saw

• Model: CR18DBL
• Voltage: 18V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 6.0 LBS
• Price: $139.00

Milwaukee  Sawzall Reciprocating Saw

• Model: 2822-20
• Voltage: 18V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 6.8 LBS
• Price: $259.00

Milwaukee Sawzall Reciprocating Saw

• Model: 2722-20
• Voltage: 18V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 8.8 LBS
• Price: $249.00

Porter-Cable Reciprocating Saw

• Model: PCC670B
• Voltage: 20V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1″
• Weight: 4.35 Lbs
• Price: $62.00

RIDGID Reciprocating Saw

• Model: R8647B
• Voltage: 18V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3200 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 7.2 LBS
• Price: $189.00

Ryobi Reciprocating Saw

• Model: PBLRS01B
• Voltage: 18V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3200 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-1/4″
• Weight: 6.7 LBS
• Price: $149.00

Skil Reciprocating Saw

• Model: RS582902
• Voltage: 20V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1″
• Weight: 4.63 LBS
• Price: $89.99

WORX Reciprocating Saw

• Model: WX516L
• Voltage: 20V
• Stroke-Per-Minute: 3000 SPM
• Stroke Length: 1-3/16″
• Weight: 5.52 LBS
• Price: $109.00

Note: Bosch was asked to participate in this Reciprocating Saw Head-to-Head, however, they declined.

Head-to-Head Testing Format

For our Best Cordless Reciprocating Saw Head-to-Head, our team looked at a total of 9 criteria, which are listed below. Each criterion was ranked independently, and the “Overall Best Cordless Reciprocating Saw” was determined using a combination of the test results.

We wanted to develop various speed tests related to several significant trades for this Cordless Reciprocating Saw Head-to-Head. We created tests that appeal to the following users and added to the standard testing criteria we always add in our Head-To-Head tests.

1. General Contractor / Demolition [timed cut test]
2. Plumbing / Heating Contractors [timed cut test]
3. Electricians [timed cut test]
4. Features
5. Ergonomics
6. Size
7. Noise
8. Price
9. Best Value
   

Testing Blade Information

All reciprocating saws were fitted with task-specific, brand-new Milwaukee Nitrus Carbide blades before testing, which shifted the focus away from the blades and more toward the saws.

• Timed Test 1:   Gas Pipe for plumbers.
• Timed Test 2:  Unistrut for electricians.
• Timed Test 3:  Nail Embedded Wood for Carpenters and Remodelers.

NITRUS CARBIDE teeth on these reciprocating saw blades allow you to cut longer, and faster. Compared to standard carbide tooth blades, Milwaukee claims that the NITRUS CARBIDE technology outlasts existing carbide-toothed reciprocating saw blades by 3-times. Milwaukee uses 25% more Carbide per tooth on their NITRUS CARBIDE blades.

Battery Pack Guidelines

For this Head to Head, we requested manufacturers send us two of their batteries in the 4.0Ah to 6.0Ah range. This was to even out the playing field as some of these companies have very large batteries for these saws.

Testing Format Information

For the Nail Embedded and Uni-strut testing, we suspended a 10-pound weight from an anchor strap on the forward grip of each reciprocating saw to ensure that each saw received the same cutting pressure.

The cut began with both hands on the saw, the front hand was released to let the 10-pound weight draw the blade through the cut. Also, some of these saws include a variable speed option. We performed the tests using the highest factory-applied speed setting.

Jig Information

Tool Box Buzz has spent countless hours designing, building, and tweaking our test jig which allows us to remove human error in some of our testing.

To ensure a repeatable even cut, the jig is composed of 4 extruded aluminum towers that act as vertical rails for a mounting platform that holds and constrains the saw.  At the heart of the jig is a 3D-printed fractal vise that can move around irregular surfaces of the saw to provide even horizontal clamping force.  Additional straps are used to hold the saws in place.

All of the saws were fitted with new Milwaukee 6-inch TORCH blades. ( 7 TPI with Nitrus Carbide Teeth) – 48-00-5261

A timing system is used on the jig that takes advantage of two carefully positioned micro-switches that control the start and stop time of the cut.  Our process was to raise the saws above the material with an attached rope, start the saws at their highest setting and use a Velcro strap to keep the saw trigger in the “full-on” position.  The saw is carefully lowered into the cut and the micro-switch timing starts as the cut sequence is initiated.  At this time the weight of the saw and the weight of the mounting platform ~20lbs was the cutting force exerted into the cut.

Gas Pipe Speed Test | Winner – FLEX

This gas pipe test is designed for plumbing and heating contractors.  Using 1-1/2″ cylindrical black steel schedule 40 gas pipe. We utilized the new Milwaukee Torch blades suitable for the thick metal in each saw and timed three cuts using our testing rig. We used Rockwell Jawhorses to hold the pipe at the desired height while we cut.

The winner of the gas pipe test was the FLEX 2271-Z with an impressive average time of 4.71 seconds. Second place was the Kobalt KRS-224B with a time of 5.15 seconds and third was the Milwaukee One Key 2822-20 with 5.63 seconds. The slowest saw that actually finished the test was the WORX coming in at 16.42 seconds.

This test, combined with the weight of the testing jig proved to be a challenge for some of the saws and a borderline torture test. The strong cutting force really gave the more robust saws their moment to shine.

Hart, Kobalt KXRS, Metabo HPT, Porter Cable, Ryobi, and Skil could not complete the test and received a DNF [Did Not Finish]. The Metabo HPT and Kobalt saws were overloaded and went into thermal overload, a feature designed to protect the motor, automatically shutting the saw down. The Porter-Cable and Skill saw motors were also overloaded, but do not have thermal overload protection, so the testing team stopped the test.

Unistrut Speed Test | Winner – FLEX

For electricians and mechanical contractors, Uni-strut is a standardized formed structural system used for light structural support, frequently for supporting wiring, piping, or mechanical components.  In each saw, we utilized new Milwaukee TORCH, (6″ 7 TPI w/ Nitrus Carbide Teeth) – 48-00-5261, blades and recorded the average time for three cuts. We used a 10lb weight on an anchor strap and let the weight do the cutting.

The winner of this test was the FLEX 2271-Z with a speed of 3.67 seconds. Kobalt KRS in a close second with 4.23 seconds and third place went to the Makita 18v at 4.48 seconds.

Every saw was able to complete this test. The slowest saw of the group was the Ridgid R8647B coming in at a whopping 23.42 seconds.

Nail Embedded Wood Speed Test | Winner – Makita 18V

For our nail-embedded wood test, we took three 2×10 joists, fastened them together, and added five (5) 3-1/2″ nails into each 2×10 for a total of fifteen (15) nails. We used a 10 lb weight fixed to an anchor strap at the front of each saw and then plowed through three nail-embedded 2x10s with each cut.

This simulates heavy-duty demolition cutting for carpenters, remodelers, and general contractors. In each saw, we utilized a new Milwaukee WRECKER (9″ 6 TPI with Nitrus Carbide Teeth) –  48-00-5272, blade suited for nail-embedded wood, and timed three cuts.

The winner of this test was the Makita XRJ05Z with an impressive speed of 28.69 seconds. The team commented on how easy the Makita is to install the blade and the surprising cutting speed.

Two-hundredths of a second [.02] slower was the FLEX at 28.71. Finishing up in third place was the Milwaukee Super Sawzall 2722-20 with an average speed of 29.62.

Porter Cable had the longest cut time at 129.51 seconds. Skil was the only saw that did not finish a cut in the test [DNF], stopping a few seconds in.

Features | Winner – Milwaukee 2722-20 One-Key

Comparing tool features from different brands is challenging, but  “the devil is in the details.” We feel that a feature assessment is necessary and the entire team discussed these features and scored them.  Each feature was worth 1 point. The total number of points available was 7.

1. Rafter hook
2. Orbital action
3. Blade release lever
4. LED Light
5. Shoe plate
6. Variable speed
7. Standout Features

The winner of the feature section is the Milwaukee One Key 2822-20. This saw had a total of 7 points, with a perfect score. This saw was well-balanced, and has a super comfortable grip and over molding, a solid rafter hook, and a smooth spring lever for blade changing.  The crew noted that the back-light for electronic controls needs to be brighter or a different contrast for working in sunlight operations.

There was a two-way tie for second place, the Milwaukee Super Sawzall, and the Ridgid with 5 points each.

The only saw that did not have any of these features was the Porter Cable, which resulted in a 0 score.

Rafter Hook

Almost all of the saws with rafter hooks were metal hooks and a swivel mount. The Hilti was the only exception with a narrower, ABS plastic style hook.

Variable Speed

All the reciprocating tested had variable triggers, but only five allow for an upper RPM limit setting. Of those five, the Milwaukee Super Sawzall has a variable analog speed dial. The Milwaukee One-Key reciprocating allows three preset settings on the tool and additional customization RPM controlling and settings through the One-Key AP. 

Stand-Out Features

Standout features are ones that other saws do not have and should be thought about when making a purchase.

Milwaukee ONE-KEY

The Milwaukee 2722-20 is the first reciprocating saw in its field to wirelessly link to a smartphone and track, manage, and customize a tool’s usage and location. With Unlimited Tool Customization, you can connect to the device and access preset setups for particular materials and fasteners, or you can fully customize the output speed and power for the current application. The custom profile is then saved to the tool’s memory after the desired output performance has been attained, making the connection to the smartphone unnecessary. Up to 4 unique profiles can be conveniently accessed from the tool’s memory with the touch of a button. Additionally, your personalized profiles are kept in the cloud and accessible at any time.

Using tools across your network of jobs and users is completely visible with integrated tool tracking, which ONE-KEY offers. The app will track all ONE-KEY compatible devices within a 100-foot radius of your phone.

All devices are traceable regardless of whether the battery is charged or on the tool because the capability is built into the instrument rather than the battery.

The program will automatically keep track of the last time a tool was in its vicinity, making it easier to find missing tools and improving crew responsibility. If you’re having problems finding a misplaced tool, ask anyone with the ONE-KEY app for assistance in broadening your search.

Additionally, the One-Key also has fixed orbital action. This means you can not turn it on or off. Unlike the Super Sawzall, which has a selectable orbit, the One-Key detects the best orbital action for cutting material.

HILTI On!Track

The HILTI 22V Nuron tools generate data which is then stored on the Nuron batteries and sent securely to the cloud during every charge without any operator interaction. NURON batteries have an internal memory card that can simultaneously store information from up to 12 tools.

When the batteries are plugged into the charger, the data is automatically uploaded to the cloud via cellular networks without any setup required. This allows users to make data-driven decisions based on site-specific tool usage patterns. Using Hilt’s ON! Track software on app and web customers can track this information by user or job site or leave it at a tool level, whichever they prefer.

Together with services like Hilti Fleet Management [paid subscription service] tool data can be used to reduce downtime and optimize tool cribs to boost customer productivity.

While this is an excellent feature, the team feels it needs to do more for the majority of Pro contractor users who are unable or unwilling to subscribe to the Hilti Fleet Management services.

DEWALT Flexvolt Advantage

DEWALT FLEXVOLT Batteries can unlock more power and better performance with Flexvolt Advantage 20v Max tools. The FLEXVOLT ADVANTAGE technology-equipped tools are aware of the battery’s connection and alter their power output accordingly. When combined with FLEXVOLT batteries, DEWALT 20V MAX* tools with FLEXVOLT ADVANTAGE technology give end users greater power.

Ergonomics | Winner – Milwaukee 2822-20  One-key

The ergonomics evaluation in this section is purely subjective and based on the opinions of the testing crew. After a full day of running performance tests, the team sat down and ranked each tool in several categories on a score of 1-10 [1 being the best]. For the ergonomics evaluation, the team evaluated the following criteria:

1. Subjective Vibration
2. Grip comfort
3. Ease of Blade Change
4. Ease of Shoe Plate Adjustment

The Milwaukee One-key reciprocating saw came in with a six score and never dropped below 2nd place in the four tested categories.  Hilti saw came in 2nd with an eight score. Third place went to the flex with double the points of the first two saws with a score of 15.

Subjective Vibration

Each evaluator ranked the tools based on perceived vibration for this category while performing each performance test. The average ranking was used for the final vibration ranking.

Vibration standouts:

The FLEX and Metabo HPT saws had minimal vibration.  The FLEX  saw includes active vibration control with FLEX’s “Shockshield Vibration Suppression.” According to FLEX, it reduces vibration by 40%.  In our testing, without knowing this information, the entire crew all commented that the FLEX was one of the saws with the least vibration.  Impressively it did this without bogging down or a reduction in power.

FLEX was “smooth as silk” to operate. ~ Rob

Grip Comfort

The crew collectively assessed how the grip surface, hand shape, and over-molding felt. Grip comfort is probably the hardest to score as a team due to the wide range of shapes and sizes of hands the team members have.

Grip Standout: DEWALT and Hilti

The team felt that the DEWALT and the Hilti saws had the most comfortable grip.

Ease of Blade Change

Every tool in this category included a tool-free blade change design. The comparison focused on the ease of changing blades. The entire team favored the external spring-loaded lever used to change the blade. The rest of the saw uses a spring-loaded twisting collet to change the blade.

Blade Change Standouts: DEWALT and Hart

Both the DEWALT and Hart saws use a spring-loaded lever to release or insert the blade. This lever was easy to operate with or without gloves.

The FLEX and Makita collets lock open and allow the blade to be inserted without twisting. The issue the team had with the collets was that many were difficult to grip, impossible to operate with gloves on, and the collet could sometimes get “buried” inside the housing of the tool, necessitating you to pull the trigger to reach the collet.

Shoe Plate Adjustment

Of the tools that had shoe plate adjustment the ones that did were controlled by either of the following:

• Lever  [A team favorite]
• Push button
• Allen key

It’s 2022, and onboard hex keys for shoe plate adjustments seem archaic but not having an adjustable shoe plate is silly. – TBB Crew Scott

FLEX has a push button on the front of the tool’s housing. During the testing, this button was recessed and got stuck inside the housing- making it impossible to adjust the shoe plate. Upon further inspection, there did not appear to be any debris build-up. The consensus was that the fit and finish of this mechanism needed to improve.

The two Kobalt Saws – have an ergonomically placed, single button, that adjusts the shoe easily. The shoe extends to the furthest point but does not come out of the tools.  The team liked that, but this button could inadvertently be hit while in operation.

The Milwaukee M18 One-Key saw has two buttons, on each side, to easily release the shoe plate completely. Dual controls need to be pressed at the same time, making a using mishap unlikely.

Size | Winner – Porter Cable

To compare the saws’ overall size (compactness), the length ranking and the weight ranking were added together. The tools were ranked from smallest to largest and least heavy to heaviest. Smaller more compact tools are easier to operate in tight spaces and weight is always a fatigue factor.

Let’s face it, a saw lighter in weight and packs a punch [power] transcends into unicorn status!  Weight is a huge consideration, after the performance, when using a reciprocating saw. The larger size saws translated into performance in our testing, we sure wish it were the opposite.

You often operate a reciprocating saw overhead, and the task can quickly cause fatigue. During the evaluation process, each reciprocating saw was weighed on our digital scale WITHOUT a battery. There are so many variations of battery packs on the market; some operators may choose a smaller battery pack for overhead tasks, and some may not.

Porter Cable took the size category measuring 15″ in length and weighing in at 4.35 lbs as a bare tool. Second place was the Skil which is 16″ in length and 4.83 lbs. Third went to Hart with 17-1/2″ and 5.00 lbs respectively.

The longest-length saw we tested was the Milwaukee One Key at 21-1/2″, placing it in last place when added with a weight of 8.80lbs. The heaviest saw was the FLEX, weighing 10.67 lbs which when added to its length of 18″, ranks it 15th out of 17 saws.

Noise Saw | Winner  – HILTI

OSHA allows 8 hours of exposure for noise levels up to 90 decibels, but the exposure limits drop rapidly at 95 decibels and higher. Hearing protection should be worn when operating a reciprocating saw because they are extremely loud.

We used a decibel meter to measure the saw’s dB level in a no-load situation at a set distance of the same height as a user’s ear spacing to test these saws consistently. The crucial point is that the saws were always compared against each other, despite decibel measurements being relative to any setting. We evaluated these saws in a no-load capacity; nevertheless, when the saws are loaded, the noise level increases and the cutting material dictates the noise level.

The saw that was the quietest was the HILTI Nuron at 87 dBs. The second quietest saw was the Metabo at 92.0 decibels. The loudest reciprocating saw we tested was the Hart at 102.8 decibels.

Best Reciprocating Saw Price | Winner – Porter Cable

Price is always a consideration when deciding which saw is best for a user. For each of the saws “as-tested,” we’ve given the current bare tool pricing discovered online at the time of writing.

The price of a tool can sometimes be the deciding factor in whether or not to buy it. We can all agree that price is an essential factor to consider when purchasing tools, especially for those of you who are just getting started in the trades. We also understand that most contractors are brand loyal and will prefer to stick with their current battery platform rather than branch out and build a new line of cordless instruments.

The reciprocating saw that cost the least was the Porter Cable coming in at $62.00 bare tool. The second cheapest-priced saw was the Skil at $89.99 [this is the kit price]. Both of these saws fall into the DIY category for saws.

The most expensive saw we tested was the Hilti Nuron which came in at $299.00 bare tool.

We did not include the price in our overall score as we felt the lesser-priced DIY saws would penalize the higher-priced, better-performing Pro-rated saws. We have pricing in its own section for you to use as you need to. Most of these saws may be found at your local big box stores, and almost all of them can be found online like ACME Tools or Amazon.

Best Value Reciprocating Saw | Winner – Kobalt KRS 224B-03

This category winner often resonates with almost everyone, because shines on the tool that performs well in our tests, while not breaking the bank. The best value reciprocating saw is the Kobalt KRS 224B-03, which came fifth place overall [out of 17 tools] and is the fifth least expensive saw, priced at $129.00 [bare tool].  This saw came in 4th place in Features, top 10 in the nail-embedded cutting test, second place in gas pipe testing, and fifth in the uni-strut cut test. It’s a solid-performing, well-priced tool and one that anyone would be happy using.

Best Cordless Reciprocating Saw | Winner – FLEX

It’s evident to the team that Flex is pushing hard on the gas pedal to enter the Pro market. This imposing saw is fantastic!

The Flex reciprocating saw was a clear winner in our testing process, with 37 awe-inspiring points. Flex shined in our performance testing, coming in 1st place in the gas pipe testing, 1st in uni-strut testing, and 2nd in nail-embedded wood.

It came in third in ergonomics and fourth in features. It is a large, stunningly powerful saw with low vibration; the team feels Flex has room to improve the blade change [collet] mechanism.

Second place was the Milwaukee One-key coming in with 44-points. A stand-out winner in ergonomics, with robust features and performance that never dipped below 5 in any cutting speed tests. The Milwaukee is a feature-rich, comfortable, robust saw. If the Flex is a suped-up, hyper-fast, and smooth-riding Chevy, the M18 Sawzall is clearly a Mercedes. Its only flaw was the hard-to-see controls in direct sunlight.

Third place goes to the Metabo 602267850. The Metabo performed held its own in every category, and their smaller footprint and lower decibel ratings propelled them to score higher in the ranks. This saw could use some improvement on vibration and the team was not a fan of the battery eject button, which is not easy to manipulate.

The MOST Comprehensive Information Available

Our ALL Pro contractor team put some serious time and effort into our Best Reciprocating Saw Head-to-Head evaluations to provide you with the most comprehensive information available.

These tests and evaluations are tough, take a lot of time, but are limited in scope. We cannot do long-term ROI testing that would determine longevity. However, the team does see a few of these tools “punch above their weight,” in our testing only to smoke out or leave us with questions about their longevity down the road. Many of those tools are also not considered pro brands.

We get lots of comments about how we make the final rankings. There are dozens of ways to compare tools; we share ALL the data from our tests, so you can re-rank the tools however you want. If you don’t care about an item we ranked? No problem. Remove that from the matrix above and re-rank them.

Other Head-to-Head Testing

In case you missed it, the crew at Tool Box Buzz has published four Head-To-Heads this year. If you have a moment, please check them out here:  Head-to-Head Tests.

Best Cordless Reciprocating Saw Head-To-Head Video | 2022

Best Cordless Reciprocating Saw Head-To-Head | 2022 is a post from Tool Box Buzz